Home Page > Research areas > Methodology > Applied stat methodology > Answering questions that cannot be answered by randomised trials

Answering questions that cannot be answered by randomised trials

Using randomised clinical trials (RCTs) to address all key questions about patient management is not feasible. However, with careful methodology, it may be possible to address more than just the randomised comparison using the other high quality data collected in a trial. For example, the impact of second-line treatments or concomitant medications both of which are highly relevant to cancer and HIV.

The Unit has completed a major causal analysis demonstrating substantial reductions in early mortality on anti-retroviral therapy in DART trial participants who were taking cotrimoxazole prophylaxis. CTU trials provide a particularly rich resource to assess the impact of such aspects of patient management.

Another major role of causal models for CTU trials is to assess the effect of different parts of the strategies evaluated, for example how much of the benefits of a strategy are due to a later switch to more toxic second-line therapy. Such causal effects are important to inform patient care and also to identify future strategies for evaluation. Several observational studies are led from the CTU, and causal methods are also needed to gain the most from these.

The methodology itself is complex and still in its infancy, with unanswered questions around the practical application such as the assessment of model fit and robustness to assumptions. The CTU will continue to collaborate with researchers at Harvard, University of California and San Francisco.

 

Key projects

  • How to compare ‘dynamic’ treatment regimes: causal modelling to investigate when to start HIV antiretroviral therapy, based on cohort studies
  • Effect of "second-line" treatments: causal analysis for trials with differential use of alternative second-line treatments, based on trial data in HIV and cancer (FOCUS) 

 

Selected publications

  • Bond SJ, White IR, Walker AS. Instrumental variables and interactions in the causal analysis of a complex clinical trial. Statistics in Medicine 2007; 26:1473-1496.
  • Walker AS, Ford D, Gilks CF, Munderi P, Ssali F, Reid A, Katabira E, Grosskurth H, Mugyenyi P, Hakim J, Darbyshire JH, Gibb DM, Babiker AG. Daily co-trimoxazole prophylaxis in severely immunosuppressed HIV-infected adults in Africa started on combination antiretroviral therapy: an observational analysis of the DART cohort. Lancet 2010;375:1278-86.